Relationship Structures

Open Relationships: What the Research Actually Says

Published May 2, 2026 · Updated Jun 18, 2026

Reviewed against our editorial standards. Last updated . This is educational content, not professional advice — see our disclaimer.

Open relationship communication

The conversation about non-monogamy has moved from the margins into mainstream media, dating apps, and dinner party debate. This is mostly good — more people thinking clearly about what they want from relationships is always better than defaulting to structures they've never examined. But the conversation has also developed its own orthodoxies: open relationships are either "the future of love" or a sign that someone is afraid of commitment. Neither is accurate. What the research actually shows is more nuanced and more useful.

What We Mean When We Say "Open"

Non-monogamy covers a wide spectrum:

  • Open relationship — Committed partners who agree to have sex (and sometimes emotional connections) with other people
  • Polyamory — Multiple romantic/emotional relationships with the consent of everyone involved
  • Monogamish — Primarily monogamous with agreed exceptions (Dan Savage's term)
  • Relationship anarchy — No hierarchy between relationships; all connections have equal standing
  • Swinging — Recreational sex with others, typically as a couple activity

These are very different structures with different requirements, failure modes, and compatibility factors. Treating them as one thing produces bad advice.

What the Research Shows

The largest dataset on non-monogamous relationships comes from Dr. Amy Moors' work at Chapman University and Dr. Terri Conley at the University of Michigan. Their findings are worth knowing:

Relationship satisfaction is comparable

When controlling for relationship length and other variables, people in consensually non-monogamous relationships report similar levels of satisfaction, trust, and commitment to those in monogamous relationships. The structure itself doesn't determine quality.

Communication requirements are higher

CNM relationships require substantially more explicit negotiation around boundaries, jealousy, scheduling, and expectations. This is both a challenge and, for many people, one of the things they value.

Jealousy doesn't disappear — it changes

People in CNM relationships still experience jealousy but often learn to process it differently. "Compersion" (pleasure at a partner's pleasure with someone else) is real but is not universal and takes time to develop.

Attrition rates are higher

Open relationships have higher rates of dissolution in the first two years, not because they're inherently less stable but because negotiating structure is difficult and takes ongoing work.

Consensual non-monogamy isn't better or worse than monogamy. It's a different structure with different requirements.

— Dr. Amy Moors, Chapman University

Why Open Relationships Fail — The Real Reasons

Not because non-monogamy is wrong, but because of specific predictable problems:

Using openness to avoid fixing an existing problem

Opening a relationship to address a mismatch in libido, emotional distance, or unhappiness rarely works. The original issue remains; the complexity multiplies.

Asymmetric enthusiasm

One partner wants this; the other agreed reluctantly. Research consistently shows asymmetric consent leads to resentment.

No agreements before implementation

Starting with "we'll figure it out as we go" and encountering the first difficult situation with no framework.

Not accounting for the time problem

Multiple relationships require real time. Many people don't do the arithmetic before starting.

Not revisiting agreements

What felt right at month one often needs updating at month six. CNM relationships need regular, explicit check-ins that monogamous relationships don't.

Who It Tends to Work For

Research doesn't suggest a "type" that should be non-monogamous — but there are patterns in who sustains it well:

  • People with high baseline secure attachment (paradoxically — not because anxious people can't do CNM, but because anxiety makes the structure harder to maintain)
  • People who are highly communication-motivated and don't find explicit negotiation draining
  • People for whom freedom is a core value and constraint produces resentment
  • People who have addressed, rather than masked, jealousy

The Consent Question

All the research that finds comparable outcomes between CNM and monogamy specifies consensual non-monogamy. Cheating — unilateral non-monogamy — produces the documented harms (betrayal trauma, trust destruction, health impacts) that critics often attribute to open relationships. The consent isn't a technicality. It's the entire architecture.

100% free until January 2028

Put this into practice

LoveCertain matches you on values, life stage, attachment and communication — the four things that predict a lasting relationship. No card required.

Join free →

Opening an Existing Relationship vs. Starting Open

Starting open (both people agree before commitment) tends to go more smoothly than opening an established relationship, where identity and security are already built on certain assumptions. Opening an established relationship isn't impossible — but it requires having a frank assessment of why and what each person wants, not just "we thought we'd try it." It also requires the willingness to close the relationship again if it isn't working — something many couples find harder to discuss than opening.

For People Considering It: Questions Worth Asking

Before either starting or opening a relationship, research suggests these questions produce useful clarity:

  • What specifically do you want from non-monogamy that you don't have now?
  • What's your honest tolerance for your partner being emotionally involved with someone else (not just sexually)?
  • What would "it's not working" look like, and what would you do then?
  • Does your partner want this independently, or are they agreeing to keep you?
  • Are you in a good place as a couple/person, or are you hoping this will fix something?
The Certain Letter

Weekly insights on attachment, relationships and finding lasting love.

What This Has to Do with Monogamous Relationships

Thinking about non-monogamy — even if you're not interested in it — tends to produce a more intentional approach to relationships generally. The explicit negotiation, the acknowledgment that relationship structure is a choice, the regular check-ins — these practices improve monogamous relationships too. You don't have to want an open relationship to benefit from the questions it raises.

What matters is intentionality. Whether you're monogamous or non-monogamous, polyamorous or partnered with one person for life, the research points to the same underlying factors: healthy habits, honest communication, and alignment on what you both actually want.

Related: Long-Distance Relationships: What Research Actually Says.

100% free until January 2028

Ready to put this to work?

LoveCertain matches you with someone genuinely compatible — on values, life stage, attachment and communication. Free until January 2028, no card required.

Join free →

More on Relationships

A note on this guidance. This article is for education and is not a substitute for professional therapy or mental-health, medical, or relationship advice. If a relationship is affecting your wellbeing or safety, please reach out to a qualified professional or a relevant support service. See our disclaimer and editorial standards.

Completely free until January 2028

Your person is not in the feed.
They’re in the data.

Take the assessment today. No card, no subscription, no catch — free for every member who joins before January 2028.

Join LoveCertain — free →